Published by the Capital City Hues - March 23, 2026
Consumers are bearing the costs of their construction and ongoing operations. These centers also pose an environmental risk to local communities. Because the data center messengers are usually deceptive about their product, the general public is often unaware of the full impact that data centers will have on their families, their neighborhoods, and their livelihoods.
A couple of years ago, an ill-informed electorate in Wisconsin spent $40 million on the construction of data centers through a provision in the state budget that created an exemption. The fiscal estimate for the project was intentionally low-balled to ensure passage, but costs are expected to rise significantly in the coming budget cycles. This measure was passed by the Republican-led legislature and signed by Governor Tony Evers, a Democrat.
Big tech companies are making billions of dollars in profit, yet they still expect communities to bear the costs of research, construction, and operations. None of their mega profits trickles down to us. Some of those profits go towards paying lobbyists and paying off local and state officials for their support. The likes of Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and the Silicon Valley crew never want to pay their fair share. They’re always looking for TIFs, gifts, and other subsidies to our detriment.
One common claim made about any construction project is that it will create plenty of jobs. The number of permanent jobs decreases once these facilities are built. They typically and intentionally require only a few highly skilled employees to operate.
Data centers have a significant carbon footprint. A single center can occupy hundreds of acres, consume five million gallons of water daily for cooling, require vast amounts of energy, and generate tons of electronic waste. They are also hot and noisy, creating health hazards for surrounding neighborhoods. Since these centers operate 24/7, they emit constant noise and light pollution. In the future, when related medical issues arise, these companies will resist accountability for the damage they cause.
We also know that the centers are hot and noisy, creating health hazards for the surrounding neighborhoods. The centers have to run 24/7, emitting constant noise and light pollution. In the future, when medical problems emerge, these parasites will fight any claims to hold them accountable for the damage they’ve caused.
Fortunately, there is bipartisan opposition to the proliferation of data centers. Community opposition to data centers has dramatically increased across the U.S. Approximately $64 billion in projects have been blocked or delayed due to organized community resistance. The scrutiny of these centers’ impact must continue so that we fully understand the real costs to the people, the environment, and our way of life. Voters and taxpayers must have the last word on data centers.
Recent Posts
Saving the tools of Democracy
Most voters take the valued tools of democracy for granted. We can access them readily without thinking about how society got them, or who’s responsible for protecting them. The foundational, electoral, and direct democracy tools are deeply integrated into the fabric of society. It has only been under the current regime that significant attention has been given to understanding what these tools are and the potential consequences of losing them.
Trump’s War and its Brown Casualties
Does citizenship only count when you die for this country? We can expect more deadly conflicts with ICE as the midterm elections get closer.
Who’s Afraid of Democratic Socialists?
Five Democratic Socialist of America candidates will be on the Wisconsin ballot on August 11. The five join dozens of other DSA candidates on ballots across the country. Attempts by the status quo by both political parties to “boogify” their affiliation with socialism don’t seem to be working. Zohran Mamdani’s rise to be mayor of the largest city in the U.S. is verifiable proof that DSA-backed candidates can get the support of voters.
Get Updates
