Putting an end to redefining war

Published by the Black Commentator - January 9, 2026

When I think about the Trump administration’s seizure of Venezuelan oil tankers and the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, I can’t help but think about the quote from the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.: “Those who love peace must learn to organize as effectively as those who love war.” The peacemakers are losing ground.

The United States was founded through conflict and built on war. Violence is part of its DNA and embedded in its identity. For most of its 250 years, the U.S. has been at war. Contrary to the patriotic narrative, very few of those wars were about defending the country; they were primarily about the acquisition of land, resources and power. What happened last week was no exception. It’s all about the oil. Period.

The constant point of contention — that such military action needs congressional approval — is irrelevant. The 1973 War Powers Resolution was passed to curb presidential abuse of power, but both parties are guilty of exploiting loopholes. An even older and supposedly more revered document is the U.S. Constitution. Article I clearly states that only Congress has the authority to declare war.

What if one avoided using the term “war” and described this illegal military aggression in other ways, couching it under national security justifications? The Trump administration claimed the U.S. didn’t declare war on Venezuela; instead, this action was merely “a law enforcement function to capture an indicted drug trafficker.”

After the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, Congress confronted both real and perceived threats to U.S. national security. It enacted legislation that granted sweeping powers to future presidents under the broad justification of combating terrorism.

We should also remember the military operations that resulted in the deaths of Osama bin Laden and Moammar Gadhafi. These were men of color who opposed U.S. imperialism, and the actual threat they posed to the U.S. remains debatable. The U.S. military violated the sovereignty of two countries to reach them.

Many people, both within and outside the U.S., have questioned the fate of leaders in this country who may be viewed unfavorably by other nations. Would they have the right to snatch up Trump and hold him accountable for his crimes?

The record of Congress on military actions confirms it will vote for such action, as it did when the Bush administration lied about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. The War Powers Resolution is as impotent as the current Congress.

Putting an end to redefining war

Published by the Black Commentator - January 9, 2026

When I think about the Trump administration’s seizure of Venezuelan oil tankers and the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, I can’t help but think about the quote from the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.: “Those who love peace must learn to organize as effectively as those who love war.” The peacemakers are losing ground.

The United States was founded through conflict and built on war. Violence is part of its DNA and embedded in its identity. For most of its 250 years, the U.S. has been at war. Contrary to the patriotic narrative, very few of those wars were about defending the country; they were primarily about the acquisition of land, resources and power. What happened last week was no exception. It’s all about the oil. Period.

The constant point of contention — that such military action needs congressional approval — is irrelevant. The 1973 War Powers Resolution was passed to curb presidential abuse of power, but both parties are guilty of exploiting loopholes. An even older and supposedly more revered document is the U.S. Constitution. Article I clearly states that only Congress has the authority to declare war.

What if one avoided using the term “war” and described this illegal military aggression in other ways, couching it under national security justifications? The Trump administration claimed the U.S. didn’t declare war on Venezuela; instead, this action was merely “a law enforcement function to capture an indicted drug trafficker.”

After the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, Congress confronted both real and perceived threats to U.S. national security. It enacted legislation that granted sweeping powers to future presidents under the broad justification of combating terrorism.

We should also remember the military operations that resulted in the deaths of Osama bin Laden and Moammar Gadhafi. These were men of color who opposed U.S. imperialism, and the actual threat they posed to the U.S. remains debatable. The U.S. military violated the sovereignty of two countries to reach them.

Many people, both within and outside the U.S., have questioned the fate of leaders in this country who may be viewed unfavorably by other nations. Would they have the right to snatch up Trump and hold him accountable for his crimes?

The record of Congress on military actions confirms it will vote for such action, as it did when the Bush administration lied about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. The War Powers Resolution is as impotent as the current Congress.

Recent Posts

How the nation celebrates its 250th year

It’s been 174 years since the famous abolitionist, Frederick Douglass, issued his scathing address on July 4 celebrations. The nation couldn’t handle the truth then, and it cannot handle it now. The Trump regime is giving us a harsh reality check as the country prepares to celebrate its 250th birthday.

Read More »

Who Really Deserves to Have Nuclear Weapons?

I often boast of being a child of the 50’s and 60’s. That’s because those years, which included the compelling Civil Rights and Black Power Movements, helped to shape my political consciousness. But I also have to admit I was a child of the Cold War and the Vietnam War, which informed my developing worldview.

Read More »

Get Updates

All Rights Reserved © 2013 - 2024

Putting an end to redefining war

Published by the Black Commentator - January 9, 2026

When I think about the Trump administration’s seizure of Venezuelan oil tankers and the kidnapping of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, I can’t help but think about the quote from the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.: “Those who love peace must learn to organize as effectively as those who love war.” The peacemakers are losing ground.

The United States was founded through conflict and built on war. Violence is part of its DNA and embedded in its identity. For most of its 250 years, the U.S. has been at war. Contrary to the patriotic narrative, very few of those wars were about defending the country; they were primarily about the acquisition of land, resources and power. What happened last week was no exception. It’s all about the oil. Period.

The constant point of contention — that such military action needs congressional approval — is irrelevant. The 1973 War Powers Resolution was passed to curb presidential abuse of power, but both parties are guilty of exploiting loopholes. An even older and supposedly more revered document is the U.S. Constitution. Article I clearly states that only Congress has the authority to declare war.

What if one avoided using the term “war” and described this illegal military aggression in other ways, couching it under national security justifications? The Trump administration claimed the U.S. didn’t declare war on Venezuela; instead, this action was merely “a law enforcement function to capture an indicted drug trafficker.”

After the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, Congress confronted both real and perceived threats to U.S. national security. It enacted legislation that granted sweeping powers to future presidents under the broad justification of combating terrorism.

We should also remember the military operations that resulted in the deaths of Osama bin Laden and Moammar Gadhafi. These were men of color who opposed U.S. imperialism, and the actual threat they posed to the U.S. remains debatable. The U.S. military violated the sovereignty of two countries to reach them.

Many people, both within and outside the U.S., have questioned the fate of leaders in this country who may be viewed unfavorably by other nations. Would they have the right to snatch up Trump and hold him accountable for his crimes?

The record of Congress on military actions confirms it will vote for such action, as it did when the Bush administration lied about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. The War Powers Resolution is as impotent as the current Congress.

Recent Posts

How the nation celebrates its 250th year

It’s been 174 years since the famous abolitionist, Frederick Douglass, issued his scathing address on July 4 celebrations. The nation couldn’t handle the truth then, and it cannot handle it now. The Trump regime is giving us a harsh reality check as the country prepares to celebrate its 250th birthday.

Read More »

Who Really Deserves to Have Nuclear Weapons?

I often boast of being a child of the 50’s and 60’s. That’s because those years, which included the compelling Civil Rights and Black Power Movements, helped to shape my political consciousness. But I also have to admit I was a child of the Cold War and the Vietnam War, which informed my developing worldview.

Read More »

Get Updates

All Rights Reserved © 2013 - 2024

Recent Posts

How the nation celebrates its 250th year

It’s been 174 years since the famous abolitionist, Frederick Douglass, issued his scathing address on July 4 celebrations. The nation couldn’t handle the truth then, and it cannot handle it now. The Trump regime is giving us a harsh reality check as the country prepares to celebrate its 250th birthday.

Read More »

Who Really Deserves to Have Nuclear Weapons?

I often boast of being a child of the 50’s and 60’s. That’s because those years, which included the compelling Civil Rights and Black Power Movements, helped to shape my political consciousness. But I also have to admit I was a child of the Cold War and the Vietnam War, which informed my developing worldview.

Read More »

Get Updates

All Rights Reserved © 2013 - 2024