Published by the Black Commentator - January 9, 2026
The United States was founded through conflict and built on war. Violence is part of its DNA and embedded in its identity. For most of its 250 years, the U.S. has been at war. Contrary to the patriotic narrative, very few of those wars were about defending the country; they were primarily about the acquisition of land, resources and power. What happened last week was no exception. It’s all about the oil. Period.
The constant point of contention — that such military action needs congressional approval — is irrelevant. The 1973 War Powers Resolution was passed to curb presidential abuse of power, but both parties are guilty of exploiting loopholes. An even older and supposedly more revered document is the U.S. Constitution. Article I clearly states that only Congress has the authority to declare war.
What if one avoided using the term “war” and described this illegal military aggression in other ways, couching it under national security justifications? The Trump administration claimed the U.S. didn’t declare war on Venezuela; instead, this action was merely “a law enforcement function to capture an indicted drug trafficker.”
After the Sept. 11 attacks on the World Trade Center, Congress confronted both real and perceived threats to U.S. national security. It enacted legislation that granted sweeping powers to future presidents under the broad justification of combating terrorism.
We should also remember the military operations that resulted in the deaths of Osama bin Laden and Moammar Gadhafi. These were men of color who opposed U.S. imperialism, and the actual threat they posed to the U.S. remains debatable. The U.S. military violated the sovereignty of two countries to reach them.
Many people, both within and outside the U.S., have questioned the fate of leaders in this country who may be viewed unfavorably by other nations. Would they have the right to snatch up Trump and hold him accountable for his crimes?
The record of Congress on military actions confirms it will vote for such action, as it did when the Bush administration lied about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. The War Powers Resolution is as impotent as the current Congress.
Recent Posts
Discovering New Insights into the Transatlantic Slave Trade – How I became the 443rd captive on the Zorg
He provides the reader with captivating aerial perspectives and close-up encounters which frame the complex relationships that both fueled and obstructed the infamous slave trade.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is dying the death of a thousand cuts.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is dying the death of a thousand cuts. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court stuck a dagger in the VRA’s guts with Shelby County v. Holder, striking down the formula that determined which jurisdictions had to get federal approval before making changes to their elections.
Stakes for Midterm Elections Grow Higher
In my previous column, I pushed for the election of Francesca Hong as a path to resuscitating a democracy on life support. I criticized the Democratic Party elites for always defaulting to the status quo and being tone-deaf to the literal cries of their constituency for economic relief and political freedom. Working people in this country are suffering under the MAGA regime and are desperately looking for candidates who fight for the working class and defend our democracy.
Get Updates
